The purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act of states that no qualified student shall, on the basis of disability be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity which the university or any other public facility sponsors or operates. Colleges and universities receiving federal financial assistance must not discriminate in the recruitment, admission, or treatment of students. Under the provisions of the ADA, as well as Section of the Rehabilitation Act ofuniversities and colleges may not:
Considering the somewhat limited array of possible candidates to author such a critique, it perhaps verges on the cosmically apropos that it ended up being Bart Walczak who ultimately penned it. Fortunately for us, the negatives of this aforementioned review are all, rather unsurprisingly, academic in origin.
The following rebuttal is in two parts: Polemic debate has a long history, has much to recommend it, and is appropriate when addressing the obtuse.
Still, we were a little surprised that he did not, as a courtesy, make us aware of it; especially since it was going to appear in print.
Bart may well have thought that such a publication, largely confined to Europe, might sail under our radar. It will be kept as brief as possible.
However, considering the profound depth of Mr. Walczak will likely publish a response to our rebuttal in the same issue. In any event, we begin with the first of his complaints, and end with the last. Positive points made by the reviewer have mostly been omitted… Unfortunately, no facsimile is included in the book, and since the authors relied on third-party transcripts, proper critical verification of the text is not possible.
However, the Harleian manuscript has been in print — facsimile and all — for over a century: Regarding the other two texts there are, in fact, only three. Man yt Wol is tacked on at the end of the Harleian, though it is probably older, perhaps 14th centurywe had a very reliable source for the Cottonian the source is an accredited academic herself, and is cited openly in the bookand every pain was taken to ensure that the Ledall manuscript was presented as accurately as possible.
Moreover, one of the authors has conferred via email with fellow scholar Terry Brown regarding the accuracy of Mr. Therefore, this seems to us to be an extraordinarily shallow complaint.
Certainly, one cannot deny that many similar elements, especially those of the most basic type, are present in all combat systems from that period, and that such exchange did indeed happen.
This is a gross and frankly unforgivable oversimplification of our argument. For those interested in knowing what our argument actually is, they can read our thesis Unified Theory: He must be confusing us with John Clements, whose views on the subject were never particularly refined.
Moreover, our esteemed colleague Richard Marsden expands and expounds upon many of the points made in our thesis in his own, which can be read here. Walczak has blatantly ignored the words of the author or authors of one of our primary surviving sources, the Hanko Dobringer manuscript: This Art is the foundation and core; and it was completely understood and known by Master Liechtenauer.
This type of complaint is invariably academic, or specialistic in origin. Most experienced martial artists find our position self evident.
Well, he also ignores the words of Master Siber to be found in our bookas well as other masters. In fact, last I heard, Bart Walczak is about as far away from pan-anything as anyone could get. In brief, he was and I can only assume still is convinced that Master Liechtenauer had invented the Art of the Longsword — and all of its constituents, or component techniques — whole cloth.
So, according to him, before Liechtenauer, there was no such thing as a Zornhau, the most basic, powerful strike one can perform with any weaponor the Zwerchhau which the Doebringer manuscript praises as the most excellent in that it both defends the body and strikes the adversary simultaneously.
At least as they applied to the longsword.
To him, Liechtenauer was the first guy to connect the dots.A professional resignation letter should include the date, your name, your current position and the title of the organization. This information is followed by your address, city, state and zip code.
Common Mistakes When Writing a Resignation Letter – Being negative about your company, your boss, coworkers, or position. – Experimenting with fonts, styles of writing, formatting, and so on.
There are four main writing styles used in professional writing and they are narrative writing style, the descriptive writing style, the expository writing style and the persuasive writing style. Each of these styles determine the goal of the writer on what they want to convey to their audience or what they want their audience to know.
A compare and contrast essay is a form of academic writing that is built around an examination of at least two items. There are two kinds of compare and contrast essays: one where you focus more on the similarities of chosen items, and one that contrasts. Sample resignation letter Ready to leave your job?
Learn how to write a resignation letter that keeps you in good standing with your employer. This sample letter of resignation can help you find the right words. All supervisors are required to complete training upon appointment that meet the mandated hour supervision requirement.
If you have any questions about your departmental training program, job training mandates, or training policies, contact your training officer.