He believes that knowledge is power, the power by which man can conquer and dominate nature.
The search for truth, does the end justify the means? The action revolves around the opinions, perceptions, reason and logic of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide.
The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie inproduced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay.
This essay will explore some of the elements of Critical thinking found within the context of this remarkable movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgement that can be prevalent in a population.
Those elements will include: To improve our thinking, we actually have to think for ourselves, to explore and make sense of thinking situations by using our thinking abilities.
Although it is important to read about Analysis the four idols and learn how other people think, there is no substitute for actually doing it ourselves. Chaffee p47 The movie has a simple premise, that a minority may affect a majority if rational thought and logic are used to construct arguments based on sound reasons and that when this is applied to lalse logic or fallacies that these can be changed.
There were three points raised in the trial that Juror 8 believed required argument analysis, 1. The knife that was the murder weapon was unique and the boy was seen with it, although he said he had lost it.
That the old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing.
Juror 8 analyses each of these points and makes credible arguments that the conclusion is flawed based on incorrect reasoning, by pointing out inconsistencies in the conclusions Bob Kavanagh Page 2 reached. The other jurors are content to believe that their reasoning is solid, as they have used examples of deductive reasoning to reach their conclusion.
Chaffee tells about deductive reasoning. The deductive argument is the one most commonly associated with the study of logic. Though it has a variety of valid forms, they all share one characteristic: If you accept the supporting reasons also called premises as true, then you must necessarily accept the conclusion as true.
During the course of the debate within the jury room Juror 8 summarises the evidence presented and the conclusions drawn by his fellow jurors, by asking questions like, what do we know about that?
Or what does this show? He analyses the content, by breaking down the component parts and analysing each point through examination of what has been presented.
He then synthesises the content by pulling together what he had summarized, and analysed and discusses it with the input of the other jurors. Finally he Bob Kavanagh Page 3 reaches an evaluation, and presents this to his peers on the jury as a reasonable version of events.
This process as described in Pearson of Sumarise, analyse, synthesise and evaluate marks juror 8 out from the rest of the jury as the most effective critical thinker as he engages in this process throughout the movie.
The antithesis to Juror 8 may be Juror 3 as portrayed by Lee J.Plato's "Allegory Of The Cave" And Francis Bacon's "The Four Idols" - How We Know What We Know 4 pages in length.
Theorists have long tried to understand how man knows what he knows, being that there is not guidebook to confirm if his assumptions are correct or . The first four kingdoms have been identified as the Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Roman Empires. This identification has come from the workings of history matching further prophecies.
Daniel already said that Babylon, specifically Nebuchadnezzar, was the head of gold (Daniel ). The Four Idols of Sir Francis Bacon by. whether or not it was the most accurate analysis of data. This is especially problematic in the analysis of "soft" data, such as the results of psychological experiments.
In actuality, however, idols of various kinds and limitations in the plans themselves may keep the political systems from. In conclusion, all four idols are still relevant to today's society, not only in a philosophical way, but in a way that affects people politically and morally as well.
Sir Francis Bacon's theory will still continue to be true for many centuries to come, and the effects of the idols he discussed will continue to impact us. Analysis of Francis Bacon's The Four Idols Essay Words | 5 Pages Analysis of Francis Bacon's The Four Idols In "The Four Idols," Francis Bacon discusses the concept of what fundamentally stands in the way of a human using the correct way of arriving upon a conclusion.
Michel gourinat dissertation abstracts secondes spectacle paris critique essay hamlet themes essay essay on science vs spirituality meaning cassandra jardine essay prize essays in folkloristics pdf francis bacon the four idols essay.