The tagline for the article reads: How we can bridge the gap? At first, especially in the early stages of the article, I found myself sharply disagreeing and feeling stung by the generalizations of families in several Brooklyn neighborhoods.
The Hebrew word used here for "men" is "Ghever," and it is commonly associated with warfare. Exodus does not specify how or if the men were armed unless perhaps Exodus Yet it does not seem to occur to the fleeing Israelites to fight back against the pursuing Egyptians.
They behave like a small band of trapped refugees. Other Bible sources, such as the census that was taken later, indicate a much smaller number of Hebrew refugees.
The sun moved backwards for Joshua and for Hezekiah. It was a sin to make up this hoax. It is a smaller sin to propagate it without verifying the facts, but certain evangelists do just that. The idea behind the story is to make up some scientific-sounding story to explain a Biblical event.
This pattern appears later in creationism literature, in supplying details of the catastrophes claimed to be part of the Flood events. Certain sections of the Bible imply that the Joshuan conquest was a sudden sweeping through the land Divided we eat essay Canaan.
Archeology suggests that the conquest was gradual, over a period of a hundred years or so, and so do certain other Biblical texts.
If those are the only problems, then the accuracy of the Bible after Genesis 11 compares favorably with other ancient literature the Iliad. The examples cited above are trivial and are not important to Salvation. The point is, if those three are all the inaccuracies we can complain about, then the Bible after Genesis 11 is rock-solid as a historical source.
The first 11 chapters of Genesis do contain some historically verifiable facts. We know of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
We know the mountains of Ararat in Turkey. The Tower of Babel is similar to Babylonian ziggurats. The contrast is with the rest of the Bible. You can carbon-date to the time of Christ a fishing boat excavated from the bottom of the Sea of Galilee, and match certain of its design features to the Gospel account of Jesus calming a storm.
It is only against this high level of verified history that the first part of Genesis seems a little strange. I am not bold or arrogant enough to conclude that "the Biblical statement thatHebrew fighting men crossed the Red Sea is wrong.
I will only say that it sounds suspicious against other Biblical accounts, archaeology, and other historical sources. An Egyptian account of the Exodus story that confirms the Biblical number could be found tomorrow. We can also believe that God could stop the sun for Joshua and Hezekiah without causing enormous tidal waves.
The crossing of the Red Seathe stopping of the Jordan River, the destruction of Jericho - these are all miracles enacted by God Almighty. The occurrence of an extremely unlikely event that serves human need can also be viewed as a miracle.
The birth of Isaac to Abraham and Sarah in their old age was a miracle Genesis However, one had better be very sure that the probabilities have been evaluated correctly, or risk disillusionment later when a more likely mechanism is discovered.
It is certainly difficult to flip coins and have them all come up heads - unless you work on the first one, the second one, and then the third one, and so on until you have heads this process took me only nine minutes.In “Divided We Eat,” Lisa Miller discusses the way food has become an indication of class.
For the most part, I agreed with what she said; food has become a luxury item. In regards to the proposed soda ban with food stamps, I agreed with a previous post by Melissa as well as what a . "What we eat has increasingly become a definitive marker of our social status.
As the the upper and middle classes constantly refine their tastes for meals sprinkled with Sicilian sea salts or for "locavore" foods, the poor find it ever harder to find affordable food that's healthy. Jan 28, · Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants. That, more or less, is the short answer to the supposedly incredibly complicated and confusing question of what we humans should eat .
“Divided We Eat” is nuanced, informative, and thoroughly researched, managing to capture many of the food buzzwords in a few pages. Though author Lisa Miller does start with a close up look at the Park Slope family, ultimately her article doesn’t revolve around these families.
I like the faith message that I get out of the "literary device" viewpoint. My only minor quibble is that the order of Genesis 1 is close enough to the natural scientific order. The article which named “Divided We Eat” was shared some experiences from others’ and authors’.
And also it talked about how does food insecure affect people’s daily life. Through the article, it reflected that nowadays, people are more likely to choice their daily meal as healthy and better as possible.